1642 September 16th: Deadliest man-made flood

 

The Yellow River (黄河)

Archaeological sequence under Kaifeng [Nature Journal]

 

The Yellow River is the second-longest river in China, second only to the Yangtze River (长江). The Yellow River has often been referred to as “China’s Sorrow,” a metaphor for all the devastating floods and disasters that stemmed from it. Historical documents and government records indicate that the Yellow River has overflown over 1,000 times over the past 2,000 years.

The low-lying city of Kaifeng sat in the epicentre of the floods. Over the past 3,000 years, it has seen around 40 major floods. Beneath its surface, there is a 20-meter-thick archaeological sequence — dating from the Bronze age to the present — that powerfully documents the devastation of this, at one time, the largest city in the world; 3-metre of these belongs to the 1642 flood.

According to the article Geoarchaeological Evidence of the AD 1642 Yellow River Flood that Destroyed Kaifeng by Nature, the elevation of the Yellow River was higher than that of Kaifeng and that near Kaifeng, which was located less than ten kilometres south of the River, the average depth of the River was around 35 meters.

By the middle of the 15th century, the Ming Dynasty's had established a robust flood-control system that had prevented flood disasters for over a century. Furthermore, like many other cities in Central China, Kaifeng had long had the tradition of building a thick and solid city wall to protect itself from invaders and floods.

However, none of these protective measures worked in 1642 when Kaifeng saw, arguably, one of the worst floods in its recorded history. The damage was not inevitable — it was man-made.

 
 

Rebel leader Li Zi-cheng (李自成)

Li Zi-cheng 李自成 [Zane Archives]

 

Li Zi-cheng (1606–1645), also known as the Dashing King (闯王), was the rebel leader who brought down the Great Ming Dynasty in April 1644.

When he was 24 years old, Li was placed on public display, with an iron collar and shackles, for failing to pay back a high-interest rate loan to a local magistrate named Ai Zhao (艾招). When a guard tried to offer some shade and water to Li, he was struck down by a government official, which angered the local peasants. They rescued Li and proclaimed him their leader. With only wooden sticks, they fought against the government troops and obtained their first real weapon. Li’s slogan was Dividing land equally and abolishing the grain taxes payment system (均田免赋); in return, the peasants rewarded him with the song, Killing cattle and sheep, preparing tasty wine and opening the city gate to welcome the Dashing King (杀牛羊, 备酒浆, 开了城门迎闯王, 闯王来了不纳粮). His reputation was that of Robinhood, attacking only the Ming officials, offering assistance and compassion to the poor.

In April 1644, Li’s rebels attacked Beijing, Emperor Chong-zhen (崇祯皇帝, reign 1627–1644) committed suicide, on 24th April, by hanging in the small garden outside the walls of the Forbidden City. After that, Li proclaimed himself emperor of the Great Shun Dynasty (大顺, 1644–1649).

On 27th May 1644, Li was defeated by the combined force of the Ming General Wu San-gui (吴三桂, 1612–1678) and the Manchurians. He fled Beijing and was not seen again. Some say he became a monk; others claimed he committed suicide by hanging himself on a lotus tree; there are also those who insisted he was killed in battle.

Regardless, his success in weakening the Ming Dynasty contributed to the success of the Manchurian conquest of China and the founding of the Great Qing Dynasty.

 
 

Third siege of Kaifeng, broke the dikes

[Liu Hongda, Xinhua]

 

On 14th February 1642, Li Zi-cheng carried out his third attempt to take down the city of Kaifeng. However, unlike the previous two times where he suffered heavy losses, he decided to besiege rather than attack.

His troops surrounded the city walls. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers and civilians were trapped inside; food and supplies became so scarce that it was reported, some people, out of desperation, turned to cannibalism.

This strategy was successful. Inside the city was full of dying hungry people; action had to be taken. Governor Henan, Gao Mingheng, believed if the situation continued, death and hunger would lead people to open the city gate and let Li and his bandits into the city. Since Kaifeng is protected by a thick and high city wall, he envisaged breaking the dike, having the water flow around the city and thus drown off the rebels stationed outside the city.

In his book, The Jews of Kaifeng, China: History, Culture and Religion, Xu Xin (徐新, 1949–present), Diane and Guilford Glazer Chair Professor of Jewish and Israel Studies at Nanjing University, noted that when it became clear the city could not hold out any longer, "The governor of Kaifeng ordered the waters of the Yellow River unleashed in hopes of destroying the rebel army…. The dikes were broken, but instead of hurting the rebels, the raging waters swept over the low-lying city, drowning a citizenry that was completely unprepared."

An alternate version of the story was that Emperor Chong-zhen (崇祯皇帝, reign 1627–1644) sent in the rescue army; before the troops entered the city, a commander ordered for the destruction of a section of the dike to break the siege. He believed the high-velocity flood would hit the rebels and free up Kaifeng. Rebel leader Li Zi-cheng found out about this beforehand and moved his troops to a higher ground — where the water could not plausibly reach — and ordered his men to break the dike at a different point. He believed that this would catch Kaifeng's defence off guard and leave his troops unscathed because of their geographical position.

In the end, both sides — defender of Kaifeng and attacker of Kaifeng — on 15th September 1642, demolished different parts of the dike at roughly the same time. This resulted in a flood more catastrophic and destructive than either had intended.

According to Roger Des Vorges, “The two resulting streams soon converged in a single rampaging torrent that smashed into the north wall of the Kaifeng.”

 
 

State of disaster caused by the flood

Yellow River Flood of 1642 [Zane Archives]

 

The following day, accompanied by torrential rain, water from the Yellow River inundated Kaifeng. The city walls, which generally would have offered some level of protection against the flood, had already partially collapsed during the siege and directed much of the water into the inner city.

According to Dr Michael Storozum of Fudan University (复旦大学), the flood was particularly "catastrophic" because the city wall had only partially collapsed, causing the floodwaters to become trapped inside, unable to flow out of the city. Thus, instead of preventing the water from quickly and easily entering the city, the city wall prevented the water from flowing out of the metropolis — significantly amplifying its destructive power.

"From a population of 378,000," Professor Xu noted, "only a few score thousand (60,000) survived." Geological records showed the entire inner city was entombed, and a few meters of silt was laid on top.

 
 

End of the Golden Age for the Kaifeng Jewish community

 

The Kaifeng synagogue that was re-constructed in 1279 was utterly wiped out. Most of the congregation's Holy Books were submerged in water. The bits and pieces that were rescued, under the instruction of the community leaders, were assembled into one complete Torah, and this then became the lifeline from which the Jews rebuilt their religious centre.

Out of the roughly 5,000 Jews, more than half were killed. By the time they made it to the northern bank of the Yellow River, fragments of only about 200 families were accounted for. Professor Xu Xin, his book The Jews of Kaifeng, China: History, Culture and Religion, commented on the significant reduction in the size of the community, “The 1489 inscription states that there were seventy clans in the community and names seventeen of them. When the survivors finally returned to their homes after the flood, the number of clans had been reduced to seven: Li, Jin, Shi, Zhao, Gao, Ai and Zhang. All the other clans were gone. When Ai Tian met Ricci, he mentioned that there were ten or twelve clans of Israelites in Kaifeng. Wang Yisha, formerly the curator of the Kaifeng Municipal Museum, believes that some of the clans maybe have been wiped out in the flood, but that others never returned to the city and instead migrated to new homes in other parts of the country. Whatever the reason, the local Jews now had only seven surnames. The community was never the same.”

Kaifeng was also now different. As the overland Silk Road diminished significantly in importance, this inland city grew further away from the economic centre, which had been shifted to the eastern coastal cities.

 
 

Kehillah’s survival assisted by Chinese family lineage

 

The Jews in China adopted the host society’s patrilineal lineage, where within the same lineage, everyone shared the same ancestor, same burial ground, came from the same place and traced to the same ancestor. Women who married into these families accepted and practised the religion of the husband. According to to Irene Eber (1929– 2019), the Louis Frieberg Professor of East Asian Studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the Jews attended the synagogue and communal services as family units, rather than individuals; as long as the family remained Jewish, the individual’s sense of identity — Jewish identity — survived.

 
 

Kehillah’s survival assisted by Jewish congregation

 

The major religions in China are individual focused rather than community based. For example, in Buddhism, worshippers mostly did not have relationship with the monasteries — they were free to worship anywhere they wanted; the monks also did not work on building a relationship between the Buddhist God and the individuals or enforced any ritual practices — believers were free to attend, or not, any services they liked. Buddhism, thus, was a religion without a strong institution, or organizational power, which worked well with the ruling regime.

Judaism, like most of the religions in the West, is organised by congregation by which the individual worshipers were attached and committed. The congregation had specific religious leaders, worship compounds, provided services from education to welfare, and had authority in interpreting the law and conducting rituals. The congregational organization provided a cushion for the Jews and reduced the speed of their assimilation into the host society.